1. Enemies of a demoniac character in the Rigveda.
2. Human foes of the Aryans, often reduced to slavery.
दास (dāsa) [Printed book page 1-356] Dāsa, like
Dasyu, sometimes denotes enemies of a demoniac
character in the Rigveda,
1 but in many passages
2 the word
refers to human foes of the Āryans. The Dāsas are described
as having forts (
puraḥ),
3 and their clans (
viśaḥ) are mentioned.
4 It is possible that the forts, which are called ‘autumnal’
(
śaradīḥ),
5 may be mythical, but it is not essential, for the
epithet may allude to their being resorted to in the autumn
season. The Dāsa colour (
Varṇa)
6 is probably an allusion to
the black skin of the aborigines, which is also directly men-
tioned.
7 The aborigines (as Dasyus) are called
anās, ‘nose-
less’(?),
8 and
mṛdhra-vāc, ‘of hostile speech,’
9 and are probably
meant by the phallus-worshippers (
śiśna-devāḥ, ‘whose deity
is a phallus’) of the Rigveda.
10 It is significant that constant
Page1-357+ 67 reference is made to the differences in religion between Ārva
and Dāsa or Dasyu.
11 Since the Dāsas were in many cases reduced to slavery, the
word Dāsa has the sense of ‘slave’ in several passages of the
Rigveda.
12 Dāsī, the feminine, always has this sense from
the Atharvaveda
13 onwards. Aboriginal women were, no doubt,
the usual slaves, for on their husbands being slain in battle
they would naturally have been taken as servants. They would
sometimes also become concubines; thus
Kavaṣa was taunted
with being the son of a female slave (
dāsyāḥ putraḥ) in the
Aitareya Brāhmaṇa.
14 Ludwig
15 considers that in some passages
16 Dāsa is applied,
in the sense of ‘enemy,’ to Āryan foes, but this is uncertain.
Zimmer
17 and Meyer
18 think that Dāsa
19 originally meant
‘enemy’ in general, later developing in Iran into the name of
the Dahae
20 of the Caspian steppes, and in India into a desig-
nation of the aborigines. On the other hand, Hillebrandt
21 argues that, as the Dāsas and the Paṇis are mentioned together,
22 they must be deemed to be closely related tribes, identifying
Page1-358+ 51 the Paṇis with the Parnians and the Dāsas of the Rigveda
with the Dahae. This view, of course, necessitates a transfer
of the scenes of the Rigveda, where Dāsas are prominent, and
especially those in which Divodāsa — ‘the heavenly Dāsa’ — plays
an important part,
23 to the far west. Hillebrandt justifies this
by regarding the scene of the sixth book of the Rigveda as
quite different from that of the seventh and third, in which
Sudās, the Bharatas, Vasiṣṭha, and Viśvāmitra appear. The
Sarasvatī of the sixth book he locates in Arachosia, that of the
seventh in the ‘Middle Country.’ It is, however, extremely
doubtful whether this theory can be upheld. That Divodāsa
should have been a Dāsa, and yet have fought against other
Dāsas, is not in itself likely, especially when his son Sudās
appears as a protagonist of Āryan civilization. It also seems
unreasonable to seek in Arachosia for the river
Sarasvati, which it is natural to locate in the ‘Middle Country.’
The wealth of the Dāsas was no doubt considerable,
24 but in
civilization there is no reason to suppose that they were ever
equal to the invaders.
25 Leading Dāsas were
Ilībiśa, Cumuri and
Dhuni, Pipru, Varcin, Śambara. For names of aboriginal
tribes, see
Kirāta, Kīkaṭa, Caṇḍāla, Parṇaka, Śiṃyu. [
Footnote: 1) Cf. Macdonell, Vedic Mythology, p. 157.] [
Footnote: 2) Cf. Rv. v. 34, 6; vi. 22, 10; 33, 3; 50, 6; vii. 83, 1; x. 38, 3; 69, 6; 3, 1; Av. v. 11, 3.] [
Footnote: 3) ii. 20, 8 (called āyasīḥ, ‘made of iron’); i. 103, 3; iii. 12, 6; iv. 32, 10. They are called śāradīḥ, ‘autumnal,’ in 1. 131, 4; 174, 2; vi. 20, 10. Cf. also dehyaḥ, ‘ramparts,’ in vi. 47, 2.] [
Footnote: 4) ii. 11, 4; iv. 28, 4; vi. 25, 2.] [
Footnote: 5) Cf. Macdonell, Vedic Mythology, p. 60.] [
Footnote: 6) ii. 12, 4; Śāṅkhāyana Śrauta Sūtra, viii. 25, 6. Cf. Rv. i. 101, 1; 130, 8; ii. 20, 7; iv. 16, 13; vi. 47, 21; vii. 5, 3. The Ārya colour is mentioned in iii. 34, 9, and the Dāsa is contrasted with the Varṇa (of the singers) in i. 104, 2. The ‘white-hued (śvitnya) friends’ who, in i. 100, 18, aid in the conquest of the Dasyu and Siṃyu are doubtless Āryans. In the Vājasaneyi Saṃhitā, xxiv. 30, the day and night (ahorātre) are paralleled with the Śūdrāryau — that is, probably with the Āryan and Śūdra (the compound is not to be taken as giving the words in the correct order; cf. Macdonell, Vedic Grammar, 268). See also Muir, Sanskrit Texts, 1^2, 140; Weber, Indische Studien, 10, 10, 11.] [
Footnote: 7) kṛṣṇā tvac, ‘black skin,’ i. 130, 8; ix. 41, 1.] [
Footnote: 8) Cf. Dasyu, notes 6, 7.] [
Footnote: 9) v. 29, 10. See Dasyu; Geldner, Rigveda, Glossar, 138.] [
Footnote: 10) vii. 21, 5; x. 99, 3. Cf. Mac- donell, op. cit., p. 155.] [
Footnote: 11) Rv. i. 33, 4. 5; iv. 16, 9; v. 7, 10; 42, 9; vi. 14, 3; viii. 70, 10; x. 22, 7. 8, etc.] [
Footnote: 12) vii. 86, 7; viii. 56, 3; x. 62, 10. Roth, St. Petersburg Dictionary, s.v., 2, suggests that in viii. 46, 32, the word dāsān, ‘slaves,’ should be read in place of dāse, qualifying Balbūtha. Zimmer, Altindisches Leben, 117, quotes the passage to indicate the admixture of Āryan and Dāsa blood. See also Av. iv. 9, 8; Chāndogya Upaniṣad, vii. 24, 2. It is uncertain whether dāsa-pravarga, as an epithet of rayi, ‘wealth,’ in Rv. i. 92, 8, means ‘consisting of troops of slaves.’ Geldner, Rigveda, Glossar, 82, so takes the expression in i. 158, 5.] [
Footnote: 13) Av. v. 22, 6; xii. 3, 13; 4, 9; Chāndogya Upaniṣad, v. 13, 2; Bṛhad- āraṇyaka Upaniṣad, vi. 1, 10 (Mādhyaṃ- dina = 2, 7 Kāṇva). Zimmer, 107, sees this sense in vadhū in Rv. viii. 19, 36. See also Vadhūmant.] [
Footnote: 14) ii. 19; Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇa, xii. 3.] [
Footnote: 15) Translation of the Rigveda, 3, 209.] [
Footnote: 16) See i. 158, 5; ii. 13, 8; iv. 30, 14. 15; vi. 20, 10; vii. 99, 5; x. 49, 6, 7. None of these passages need certainly be so taken.] [
Footnote: 17) Altindisches Leben, 110 et seq.] [
Footnote: 18) Geschichte des Altertums, 1, 515.] [
Footnote: 19) If derived from das in the sense of ‘lay waste’ (Whitney, Roots), the original meaning would have been ‘devastator,’ ‘ravager.’] [
Footnote: 20) The Dahae may have been closely allied in race and language with the Iranians, but this is not very clearly proved. Cf. E. Kuhn in Kuhn's Zeit- schrift, 28, 214; Hillebrandt, Vedische Mythologie, 1, 95. The possibility or probability of mixture with Mongolian blood is always present. So Zimmer, op. cit., 112, calls the Daoi or Daai of Herodotus, i. 126, a Turanian tribe.] [
Footnote: 21) Op. cit., 1, 94.] [
Footnote: 22) Rv. v. 34, 6. 7; vii. 6, 3 (Dasyu and Paṇi together); Av. v. 11, 6.] [
Footnote: 23) Op. cit., 1, 96 et seq., He argues that Dāsa occurs only four times in Maṇḍala vii., but eight times in vi., and that similarly Śambara, the Dāsa, is mentioned six times in vi., but only twice in vii. But Divodāsa much more probably means, as Oldenberg in- terprets the name, ‘the servant of heaven.’ See his Religion des Veda, 155, n. 1; Bergaigne, Religion Védique, 2, 209; below, p. 363, n. 11.] [
Footnote: 24) Cf. Rv. i. 176, 4; iv. 30, 13; viii. 40, 6; x. 69. 5; Av. vii. 90, 2.] [
Footnote: 25) Cf. Rv. ii. 12, 11; iv. 30. 14; vi. 26, 5, whence it appears that the Dāsas were often dwellers in moun- tains, a natural refuge for beaten tribes. Cf. Hillebrandt, Vedische Mythologie, 3, 269-275, 368; Ludwig, Translation of the Rigveda, 3, 207-213; Zimmer, Altindisches Leben, 101-118; Weber, Indische Studien, 18, 35 (who derives dāsa from dā, ‘bind’), 254; Muir, Sanskrit Texts, 2, 359 et seq.; Geldner, Vedische Studien, 3, 96.] [ID=1305]